Generic Acomplia (Rimonabant, Acomplia® equivalent)
Rimonabant is an anorectic anti-obesity medication. It is a CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist. Rimonabant has been found effective in stopping food craving, and is used to assist in losing weight. It is indicated for use in conjunction with diet and exercise for patients with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, and recently was also proven effective in smoking cessation. This is a non-controlled weight loss solution with proven results.
This product will arrive to you in 14-24 business days (free shipping worldwide)
20mg
| Quantity | Price | Price per pill | Returning customer price | Bonus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | € 69.42 | € 2.31 | € 62.40 | ---- | Add to cart |
| 60 | € 120.90 | € 2.02 | € 108.42 | ---- | Add to cart |
| 90 | € 147.42 | € 1.64 | € 132.60 | ---- | Add to cart |
Drug Medical Information
AGE AND BEHAVIOR: SLOW RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULATION - INPUT AND PERIPHERAL MECHANISMS - RULING OUT SENSORY-STIMULUS INTENSITY
A similar conclusion was reached in later studies where more direct tests were made. The concept of perceptual difficulty as used in this study of bar lengths was more akin to the concept of sensation than it was to higher-order perceptual responses involving discriminations. The concept of perceptual difficulty was used more in terms of the intensity of input than in terms of making judgments. Perhaps it would have been more appropriate to refer to the differences in bar length as "sensory difficulty" or "stimulus difficulty" or even "stimulus intensity." A test was made of the proposition that the loss of speed with age is due mainly to functional stimulus intensity, i.e., sensory ability differences between old and young (Botwinick, 1971). Knowing that speed of response is slower when the intensity of stimulation is weaker, and knowing that sensory ability diminishes with age, could it be that the poorer hearing and seeing ability of the old makes the typical laboratory stimuli functionally weaker for them and, as a result, they react more slowly to the stimuli than do younger people? The reaction times (RTs) of young adults (17-22 years) were compared with those of older adults (64-79 years) in three ways. One, a loud tone stimulus was used, the same one for all subjects (approximately 81 db). This is the type of tone typically used in laboratory studies of RT. Two, a weak sound was used, but different for each subject. By the method of limits, the lowest intensity tone heard by each subject 100 percent of the time was determined. This intensity, different and individual for each subject, was then used to measure RT. Three, the lowest intensity tone heard by each subject approximately 75 percent of the time was determined and used for measuring RT. In this way, each subject was measured for RT with three intensities of tone stimuli, two which were low and unique to the individual based upon his reported hearing ability, and one which was loud and the same for everyone. If the slowing with age is primarily a problem of sensing the stimulus, then equating this factor between age groups should solve this problem. If sensing the stimulus is not the reason for the slowing, then the old should have RTs slower than the young. Not only did the equating of stimulus intensity fail to do away with the slowing of the old age group, it maximized it. This study, then, provided no support for the proposition that the aged are slow because of problems in sensing inputs. *216\220\8*
